Lithuania vs Northern America: IPPU — Emissions Share
IPPU — Emissions Share over time
- Lithuania
- Northern America
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 28.85 % against 8.24 % in Northern America, a difference of 20.61 %.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 3.5 times Northern America's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 11th and Northern America ranks 10th of 208 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Northern America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.3 % | 11.29 % | 5.01 % | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 31.38 % | 7.41 % | 23.98 % | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 35.75 % | 7.64 % | 28.11 % | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 30.89 % | 8.23 % | 22.66 % | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions share, Lithuania or Northern America?
- Lithuania, at 28.85 % against 8.24 % in Northern America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions share between Lithuania and Northern America?
- 20.61 %, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Northern America?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Northern America rank globally for ippu — emissions share?
- Lithuania ranks 11th and Northern America ranks 10th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions Share (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.