Belarus vs Denmark: Land-use change — Emissions
Land-use change — Emissions over time
- Belarus
- Denmark
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Denmark, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 98th and Denmark ranks 98th of 222 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Denmark in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,968 kt | 0 kt | 2,968 kt | Belarus |
| 2000s | 296.81 kt | 0 kt | 296.81 kt | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1,758 kt | 430.74 kt | 1,328 kt | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 269.21 kt | 269.21 kt | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land-use change — emissions, Belarus or Denmark?
- Belarus, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Denmark as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land-use change — emissions between Belarus and Denmark?
- 0 kt, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Denmark?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Denmark rank globally for land-use change — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 98th and Denmark ranks 98th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Land-use change — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf