Cuba vs Kyrgyzstan: Land-use change — Emissions
Land-use change — Emissions over time
- Cuba
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 98th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 98th of 222 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 308.19 kt | 0 kt | 308.19 kt | Cuba |
| 2000s | 30.82 kt | 0 kt | 30.82 kt | Cuba |
| 2010s | 461.56 kt | 940.31 kt | 478.75 kt | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 288.48 kt | 587.7 kt | 299.22 kt | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land-use change — emissions, Cuba or Kyrgyzstan?
- Cuba, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land-use change — emissions between Cuba and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0 kt, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Kyrgyzstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for land-use change — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 98th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 98th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Land-use change — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf