Cuba vs Mongolia: Land-use change — Emissions
Land-use change — Emissions over time
- Cuba
- Mongolia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Mongolia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mongolia ahead.
Cuba ranks 98th and Mongolia ranks 98th of 222 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 308.19 kt | 1,175 kt | 866.36 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 30.82 kt | 1,077 kt | 1,047 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 461.56 kt | 250.14 kt | 211.43 kt | Cuba |
| 2020s | 288.48 kt | 43.26 kt | 245.22 kt | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land-use change — emissions, Cuba or Mongolia?
- Cuba, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land-use change — emissions between Cuba and Mongolia?
- 0 kt, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Mongolia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Mongolia rank globally for land-use change — emissions?
- Cuba ranks 98th and Mongolia ranks 98th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Land-use change — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf