Grenada vs Mongolia: Land-use change — Emissions
Land-use change — Emissions over time
- Grenada
- Mongolia
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Mongolia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 97th and Mongolia ranks 97th of 216 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 1,175 kt | 1,175 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 1,077 kt | 1,077 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 250.14 kt | 250.14 kt | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 43.26 kt | 43.26 kt | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land-use change — emissions, Grenada or Mongolia?
- Grenada, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land-use change — emissions between Grenada and Mongolia?
- 0 kt, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Mongolia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Mongolia rank globally for land-use change — emissions?
- Grenada ranks 97th and Mongolia ranks 97th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Land-use change — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf