Lithuania vs Monaco: Land-use change — Emissions
Land-use change — Emissions over time
- Lithuania
- Monaco
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Monaco, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Monaco ahead.
Lithuania ranks 97th and Monaco ranks 97th of 216 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 864.42 kt | 0 kt | 864.42 kt | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land-use change — emissions, Lithuania or Monaco?
- Lithuania, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Monaco as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land-use change — emissions between Lithuania and Monaco?
- 0 kt, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Monaco?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Monaco rank globally for land-use change — emissions?
- Lithuania ranks 97th and Monaco ranks 97th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Land-use change — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf