Denmark vs Rwanda: Land-use change — Emissions (CO2), per capita (CO2 capita)
Denmark
0 kt per person
in 2023
Rwanda
0 kt per person
in 2023
Denmark rank
95th
Rwanda rank
95th
Land-use change — Emissions (CO2), per capita (CO2 capita) over time
- Denmark
- Rwanda
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Denmark ranks 95th and Rwanda ranks 95th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0.0002 kt per person | 0.0002 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0.0001 kt per person | 0.0001 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0.0001 kt per person | Denmark |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land-use change — emissions (co2), per capita, Denmark or Rwanda?
- Denmark, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land-use change — emissions (co2), per capita between Denmark and Rwanda?
- 0 kt per person, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Rwanda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Denmark and Rwanda rank globally for land-use change — emissions (co2), per capita?
- Denmark ranks 95th and Rwanda ranks 95th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Land-use change — Emissions (CO2), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Land-use change — Emissions (CO2) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.