Libya vs Lithuania: Land-use change — Emissions (CO2), per capita (CO2 capita)
Libya
0 kt per person
in 2023
Lithuania
0 kt per person
in 2023
Libya rank
92nd
Lithuania rank
95th
Land-use change — Emissions (CO2), per capita (CO2 capita) over time
- Libya
- Lithuania
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Lithuania, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 92nd and Lithuania ranks 95th of 200 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 3 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Libya |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Libya |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0.0003 kt per person | 0.0003 kt per person | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher land-use change — emissions (co2), per capita, Libya or Lithuania?
- Libya, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in land-use change — emissions (co2), per capita between Libya and Lithuania?
- 0 kt per person, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Lithuania rank globally for land-use change — emissions (co2), per capita?
- Libya ranks 92nd and Lithuania ranks 95th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Land-use change — Emissions (CO2), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Land-use change — Emissions (CO2) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.