Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Land-use change — Emissions

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
15.47 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo
38.41 kt
in 2023
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
5th
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
3rd

Land-use change — Emissions over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
0204060199020062023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 38.41 kt against 15.47 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 22.94 kt.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 2.5 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of the Congo has been ahead every year.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 5th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 3rd of 21 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Democratic Republic of the Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 10.19 kt 38.86 kt 28.67 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 10.72 kt 50.16 kt 39.44 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 10.02 kt 56.76 kt 46.74 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 14.53 kt 45.2 kt 30.67 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher land-use change — emissions, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Democratic Republic of the Congo?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 38.41 kt against 15.47 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in land-use change — emissions between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
22.94 kt, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Democratic Republic of the Congo?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Democratic Republic of the Congo rank globally for land-use change — emissions?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 5th and Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 3rd of 21 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Land-use change — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Land-use change — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-change-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/land-use-change-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Democratic Republic of the Congo: Land-use change — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Land-use change — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 8,993 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf