Hong Kong vs North Macedonia: Primary energy from low-carbon energy

Hong Kong
3.16 terawatt-hours
in 2025
North Macedonia
3.71 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Hong Kong rank
73rd
North Macedonia rank
71st

Primary energy from low-carbon energy over time

  • Hong Kong
  • North Macedonia
01234196519952025

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 3.71 terawatt-hours against 3.16 terawatt-hours in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.55 terawatt-hours.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 73rd and North Macedonia ranks 71st of 80 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 terawatt-hours 0.8427 terawatt-hours 0.8427 terawatt-hours North Macedonia
2000s 0.0003 terawatt-hours 1.17 terawatt-hours 1.17 terawatt-hours North Macedonia
2010s 0.5525 terawatt-hours 1.7 terawatt-hours 1.14 terawatt-hours North Macedonia
2020s 2.18 terawatt-hours 2.29 terawatt-hours 0.1096 terawatt-hours North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher primary energy from low-carbon energy, Hong Kong or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 3.71 terawatt-hours against 3.16 terawatt-hours in Hong Kong as of 2025.
What is the difference in primary energy from low-carbon energy between Hong Kong and North Macedonia?
0.55 terawatt-hours, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and North Macedonia?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong and North Macedonia rank globally for primary energy from low-carbon energy?
Hong Kong ranks 73rd and North Macedonia ranks 71st of 80 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Energy Institute – Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Primary energy from low-carbon energy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs North Macedonia: Primary energy from low-carbon energy. Statizoid, drawing on Energy Institute – Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/low-carbon-energy-consumption/hong-kong-sar-china/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/low-carbon-energy-consumption/hong-kong-sar-china/north-macedonia/">Hong Kong vs North Macedonia: Primary energy from low-carbon energy</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Primary energy from low-carbon energy
Unit
terawatt-hours
Source
Energy Institute – Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
82 places, 4,680 data points, 1965–2025
Last refreshed

Measured in terawatt-hours of total energy supply.