Albania vs Uruguay: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC over time
- Albania
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 1,043 kt against 911 kt in Albania, a difference of 132 kt.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Albania's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Albania has been ahead every year.
Albania ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 21st of 83 countries.
Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,113 kt | -2,481 kt | 4,594 kt | Albania |
| 2000s | 1,993 kt | -9,567 kt | 11,560 kt | Albania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc, Albania or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 1,043 kt against 911 kt in Albania as of 2017.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc between Albania and Uruguay?
- 132 kt, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Uruguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2008.
- How do Albania and Uruguay rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc?
- Albania ranks 22nd and Uruguay ranks 21st of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf