Belarus vs Norway: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC over time
- Belarus
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports -19,129 kt against -31,822 kt in Belarus, a difference of 12,693 kt.
Across all 28 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 65th and Norway ranks 62nd of 83 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -33,535 kt | -15,749 kt | 17,786 kt | Norway |
| 2000s | -41,214 kt | -23,525 kt | 17,689 kt | Norway |
| 2010s | -43,740 kt | -19,777 kt | 23,964 kt | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc, Belarus or Norway?
- Norway, at -19,129 kt against -31,822 kt in Belarus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc between Belarus and Norway?
- 12,693 kt, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Norway?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Norway rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc?
- Belarus ranks 65th and Norway ranks 62nd of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf