Chile vs Turkey: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC over time
- Chile
- Turkey
How they compare
Chile currently reports -64,185 kt against -84,186 kt in Turkey, a difference of 20,001 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Turkey ahead.
Chile ranks 78th and Turkey ranks 79th of 89 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -50,111 kt | -56,631 kt | 6,520 kt | Chile |
| 2000s | -47,380 kt | -68,297 kt | 20,917 kt | Chile |
| 2010s | -73,488 kt | -85,230 kt | 11,742 kt | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc, Chile or Turkey?
- Chile, at -64,185 kt against -84,186 kt in Turkey as of 2018.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc between Chile and Turkey?
- 20,001 kt, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Turkey?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Chile and Turkey rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc?
- Chile ranks 78th and Turkey ranks 79th of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf