Croatia vs Georgia: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC over time
- Croatia
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports -4,924 kt against -5,682 kt in Croatia, a difference of 758 kt.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 56th and Georgia ranks 53rd of 89 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -8,385 kt | 797.17 kt | 9,183 kt | Georgia |
| 2000s | -7,248 kt | -4,783 kt | 2,465 kt | Georgia |
| 2010s | -5,944 kt | -4,239 kt | 1,705 kt | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc, Croatia or Georgia?
- Georgia, at -4,924 kt against -5,682 kt in Croatia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc between Croatia and Georgia?
- 758 kt, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Georgia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Croatia and Georgia rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc?
- Croatia ranks 56th and Georgia ranks 53rd of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf