Cyprus vs Israel: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC over time
- Cyprus
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports -256.38 kt against -384.89 kt in Cyprus, a difference of 128.51 kt.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 33rd and Israel ranks 31st of 83 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 2 and Israel in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -245.37 kt | -370 kt | 124.63 kt | Cyprus |
| 2000s | -299.25 kt | -329.91 kt | 30.66 kt | Cyprus |
| 2010s | -383.69 kt | -264.93 kt | 118.76 kt | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc, Cyprus or Israel?
- Israel, at -256.38 kt against -384.89 kt in Cyprus as of 2018.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc between Cyprus and Israel?
- 128.51 kt, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Israel?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Cyprus and Israel rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc?
- Cyprus ranks 33rd and Israel ranks 31st of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf