Cyprus vs Luxembourg: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC over time
- Cyprus
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports -322.46 kt against -384.89 kt in Cyprus, a difference of 62.43 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 33rd and Luxembourg ranks 32nd of 83 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -286.08 kt | -610.73 kt | 324.66 kt | Cyprus |
| 2010s | -383.81 kt | -375.62 kt | 8.19 kt | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc, Cyprus or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at -322.46 kt against -384.89 kt in Cyprus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc between Cyprus and Luxembourg?
- 62.43 kt, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Luxembourg?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Cyprus and Luxembourg rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc?
- Cyprus ranks 33rd and Luxembourg ranks 32nd of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf