Ghana vs Uruguay: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC over time
- Ghana
- Uruguay
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 2,612 kt against 1,043 kt in Uruguay, a difference of 1,569 kt.
That makes Ghana's figure about 2.5 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uruguay ahead.
Ghana ranks 18th and Uruguay ranks 21st of 83 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -16,686 kt | -2,481 kt | 14,205 kt | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 2,072 kt | -10,828 kt | 12,901 kt | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc, Ghana or Uruguay?
- Ghana, at 2,612 kt against 1,043 kt in Uruguay as of 2006.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc between Ghana and Uruguay?
- 1,569 kt, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Uruguay?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2006.
- How do Ghana and Uruguay rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc?
- Ghana ranks 18th and Uruguay ranks 21st of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf