Israel vs Luxembourg: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC over time
- Israel
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Israel currently reports -256.38 kt against -322.46 kt in Luxembourg, a difference of 66.08 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 31st and Luxembourg ranks 32nd of 83 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -329.91 kt | -582.67 kt | 252.76 kt | Israel |
| 2010s | -264.93 kt | -381.53 kt | 116.6 kt | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc, Israel or Luxembourg?
- Israel, at -256.38 kt against -322.46 kt in Luxembourg as of 2018.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc between Israel and Luxembourg?
- 66.08 kt, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Luxembourg?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Israel and Luxembourg rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc?
- Israel ranks 31st and Luxembourg ranks 32nd of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf