Israel vs Mauritius: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC over time
- Israel
- Mauritius
How they compare
Israel currently reports -256.38 kt against -490.71 kt in Mauritius, a difference of 234.33 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mauritius ahead.
Israel ranks 31st and Mauritius ranks 34th of 83 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -308.16 kt | -236.36 kt | 71.79 kt | Mauritius |
| 2010s | -291.29 kt | -490.71 kt | 199.42 kt | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc, Israel or Mauritius?
- Israel, at -256.38 kt against -490.71 kt in Mauritius as of 2018.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc between Israel and Mauritius?
- 234.33 kt, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Mauritius?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2013.
- How do Israel and Mauritius rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc?
- Israel ranks 31st and Mauritius ranks 34th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf