Kenya vs Mexico: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC over time
- Kenya
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 31,462 kt against 21,090 kt in Kenya, a difference of 10,372 kt.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.5 times Kenya's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 8th and Mexico ranks 6th of 83 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -9,278 kt | 51,343 kt | 60,621 kt | Mexico |
| 2000s | 19,048 kt | 48,249 kt | 29,201 kt | Mexico |
| 2010s | 21,090 kt | 25,726 kt | 4,636 kt | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc, Kenya or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 31,462 kt against 21,090 kt in Kenya as of 2013.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc between Kenya and Mexico?
- 10,372 kt, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Mexico?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2010.
- How do Kenya and Mexico rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc?
- Kenya ranks 8th and Mexico ranks 6th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf