Latvia vs Montenegro: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC over time
- Latvia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports -2,167 kt against -2,581 kt in Latvia, a difference of 414 kt.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 44th and Montenegro ranks 43rd of 83 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -6,859 kt | -2,226 kt | 4,633 kt | Montenegro |
| 2010s | -3,202 kt | -2,215 kt | 986.99 kt | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc, Latvia or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at -2,167 kt against -2,581 kt in Latvia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc between Latvia and Montenegro?
- 414 kt, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Montenegro?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2011.
- How do Latvia and Montenegro rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc?
- Latvia ranks 44th and Montenegro ranks 43rd of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf