Poland vs Portugal: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC over time
- Poland
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports -8,290 kt against -17,036 kt in Poland, a difference of 8,746 kt.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 60th and Portugal ranks 58th of 83 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -26,831 kt | -5,481 kt | 21,350 kt | Portugal |
| 2000s | -40,876 kt | -7,778 kt | 33,099 kt | Portugal |
| 2010s | -35,235 kt | -6,992 kt | 28,243 kt | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc, Poland or Portugal?
- Portugal, at -8,290 kt against -17,036 kt in Poland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc between Poland and Portugal?
- 8,746 kt, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Portugal?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Poland and Portugal rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc?
- Poland ranks 60th and Portugal ranks 58th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf