Spain vs Sweden: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC over time
- Spain
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports -37,222 kt against -37,991 kt in Spain, a difference of 769 kt.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Spain ahead.
Spain ranks 70th and Sweden ranks 68th of 83 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -35,763 kt | -38,518 kt | 2,755 kt | Spain |
| 2000s | -39,297 kt | -40,035 kt | 737.85 kt | Spain |
| 2010s | -37,827 kt | -38,952 kt | 1,124 kt | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc, Spain or Sweden?
- Sweden, at -37,222 kt against -37,991 kt in Spain as of 2019.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc between Spain and Sweden?
- 769 kt, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Sweden?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Spain and Sweden rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2) — unfccc?
- Spain ranks 70th and Sweden ranks 68th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf