Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 3.29 % change on previous year against -1.93 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 5.22 % change on previous year.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.7 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 31st and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 29th of 233 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.96 % change on previous year | 0.0458 % change on previous year | 1.91 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2000s | 1.8 % change on previous year | 0.0444 % change on previous year | 1.76 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2010s | -11.06 % change on previous year | -0.2916 % change on previous year | 10.77 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | -16.25 % change on previous year | -6.61 % change on previous year | 9.64 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 3.29 % change on previous year against -1.93 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 5.22 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 31st and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 29th of 233 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.