Australia and New Zealand vs East Timor: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate

Australia and New Zealand
3.29 % change on previous year
in 2023
East Timor
3.42 % change on previous year
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
31st
East Timor rank
28th

LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • East Timor
-200-1000100199120072023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 3.42 % change on previous year against 3.29 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.13 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was East Timor ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 31st and East Timor ranks 28th of 233 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and East Timor in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand East Timor Difference Ahead
1990s 1.96 % change on previous year -0.0572 % change on previous year 2.02 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
2000s 1.8 % change on previous year 0.1441 % change on previous year 1.66 % change on previous year Australia and New Zealand
2010s -11.06 % change on previous year 0.3634 % change on previous year 11.42 % change on previous year East Timor
2020s -16.25 % change on previous year -10.32 % change on previous year 5.93 % change on previous year East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate, Australia and New Zealand or East Timor?
East Timor, at 3.42 % change on previous year against 3.29 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand and East Timor?
0.13 % change on previous year, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and East Timor?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and East Timor rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 31st and East Timor ranks 28th of 233 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs East Timor: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/lulucf-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/lulucf-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/australia-and-new-zealand/timor-leste/">Australia and New Zealand vs East Timor: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
266 places, 7,973 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.