Gibraltar vs New Caledonia: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Gibraltar
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
New Caledonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Gibraltar rank
219th
New Caledonia rank
219th
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate over time
- Gibraltar
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 7 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Gibraltar ranks 219th and New Caledonia ranks 219th of 233 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate, Gibraltar or New Caledonia?
- Gibraltar, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 1999.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate between Gibraltar and New Caledonia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and New Caledonia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
- How do Gibraltar and New Caledonia rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate?
- Gibraltar ranks 219th and New Caledonia ranks 219th of 233 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.