Gibraltar vs Turks and Caicos Islands: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Gibraltar
-100 % change on previous year
in 1999
Turks and Caicos Islands
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Gibraltar rank
219th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
219th
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate over time
- Gibraltar
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.
Gibraltar ranks 219th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 219th of 233 countries.
Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate, Gibraltar or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Gibraltar, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 1999.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate between Gibraltar and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1999.
- How do Gibraltar and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate?
- Gibraltar ranks 219th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 219th of 233 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.