Latvia vs Malta: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Latvia
0.0018 % change on previous year
in 2023
Malta
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Latvia rank
81st
Malta rank
83rd
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate over time
- Latvia
- Malta
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0018 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Malta, a difference of 0.0018 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Malta ahead.
Latvia ranks 81st and Malta ranks 83rd of 233 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -0.0014 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0.0014 % change on previous year | Malta |
| 2020s | 111.21 % change on previous year | 22.73 % change on previous year | 88.49 % change on previous year | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate, Latvia or Malta?
- Latvia, at 0.0018 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate between Latvia and Malta?
- 0.0018 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malta?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Malta rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate?
- Latvia ranks 81st and Malta ranks 83rd of 233 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.