Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
-1.93 % change on previous year
in 2023
Myanmar
5.4 % change on previous year
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
29th
Myanmar rank
26th

LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Myanmar
-20-1001020199120072023

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 5.4 % change on previous year against -1.93 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 7.33 % change on previous year.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 2.8 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Myanmar ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 29th and Myanmar ranks 26th of 33 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Myanmar in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Myanmar Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0458 % change on previous year 0.0571 % change on previous year 0.0113 % change on previous year Myanmar
2000s 0.0444 % change on previous year -0.4513 % change on previous year 0.4957 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s -0.2916 % change on previous year -1.64 % change on previous year 1.35 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s -6.61 % change on previous year 0.5949 % change on previous year 7.21 % change on previous year Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 5.4 % change on previous year against -1.93 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar?
7.33 % change on previous year, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Myanmar rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 29th and Myanmar ranks 26th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/lulucf-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/lulucf-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/myanmar/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Myanmar: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
266 places, 7,973 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.