Belgium-Luxembourg vs Congo: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports -3,760 kt against -4,517 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 757 kt.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 230th and Congo ranks 227th of 257 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq), Belgium-Luxembourg or Congo?
- Congo, at -3,760 kt against -4,517 kt in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium-Luxembourg and Congo?
- 757 kt, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Congo?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Congo rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 230th and Congo ranks 227th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf