Congo vs Croatia: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Congo
- Croatia
How they compare
Congo currently reports -3,760 kt against -4,053 kt in Croatia, a difference of 293 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 227th and Croatia ranks 228th of 257 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,078 kt | -831.55 kt | 9,909 kt | Congo |
| 2000s | 8,797 kt | -821.64 kt | 9,619 kt | Congo |
| 2010s | 14,168 kt | -2,753 kt | 16,921 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 1,322 kt | -4,233 kt | 5,555 kt | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq), Congo or Croatia?
- Congo, at -3,760 kt against -4,053 kt in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) between Congo and Croatia?
- 293 kt, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Croatia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Croatia rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq)?
- Congo ranks 227th and Croatia ranks 228th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf