Congo vs Pakistan: LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Congo
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports -3,498 kt against -3,760 kt in Congo, a difference of 262 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 227th and Pakistan ranks 226th of 257 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,075 kt | 2,369 kt | 6,707 kt | Congo |
| 2000s | 8,797 kt | 2,491 kt | 6,307 kt | Congo |
| 2010s | 14,168 kt | 725.34 kt | 13,443 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 1,322 kt | -3,643 kt | 4,965 kt | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions (co2eq), Congo or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at -3,498 kt against -3,760 kt in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions (co2eq) between Congo and Pakistan?
- 262 kt, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Pakistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Pakistan rank globally for lulucf — emissions (co2eq)?
- Congo ranks 227th and Pakistan ranks 226th of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf