Afghanistan vs Samoa: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Afghanistan
- Samoa
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Samoa, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Samoa ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 132nd and Samoa ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0014 kt | 0.0012 kt | Samoa |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0011 kt | 0.0011 kt | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Afghanistan or Samoa?
- Afghanistan, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Afghanistan and Samoa?
- 0 kt, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Samoa?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Samoa rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Afghanistan ranks 132nd and Samoa ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf