Argentina vs Malawi: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Argentina
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.3631 kt against 0.3589 kt in Argentina, a difference of 0.0042 kt.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 42nd and Malawi ranks 41st of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.23 kt | 0.5082 kt | 1.72 kt | Argentina |
| 2000s | 1.42 kt | 0.6779 kt | 0.7376 kt | Argentina |
| 2010s | 0.7966 kt | 1.04 kt | 0.2394 kt | Malawi |
| 2020s | 1.56 kt | 0.6328 kt | 0.925 kt | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Argentina or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 0.3631 kt against 0.3589 kt in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Argentina and Malawi?
- 0.0042 kt, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Malawi?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Malawi rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Argentina ranks 42nd and Malawi ranks 41st of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf