Austria vs Comoros: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Austria
- Comoros
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Comoros, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Comoros ahead.
Austria ranks 106th and Comoros ranks 106th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Comoros in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0008 kt | 0.0024 kt | 0.0017 kt | Comoros |
| 2000s | 0.001 kt | 0.0072 kt | 0.0062 kt | Comoros |
| 2010s | 0.0012 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0005 kt | Austria |
| 2020s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0006 kt | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Austria or Comoros?
- Austria, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Austria and Comoros?
- 0 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Comoros?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Comoros rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Austria ranks 106th and Comoros ranks 106th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf