Austria vs Slovakia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Austria
- Slovakia
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Slovakia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 106th and Slovakia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0001 kt | Austria |
| 2000s | 0.001 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0005 kt | Austria |
| 2010s | 0.0012 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0.0008 kt | Austria |
| 2020s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0006 kt | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Austria or Slovakia?
- Austria, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Austria and Slovakia?
- 0 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Slovakia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Austria ranks 106th and Slovakia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf