Azerbaijan vs Czechia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Azerbaijan
- Czechia
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Czechia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 106th and Czechia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0058 kt | 0.0007 kt | 0.0051 kt | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 0.0046 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.004 kt | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 0.0026 kt | 0.0015 kt | 0.0011 kt | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 0.0066 kt | 0.0019 kt | 0.0047 kt | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Azerbaijan or Czechia?
- Azerbaijan, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Azerbaijan and Czechia?
- 0 kt, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Czechia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Azerbaijan ranks 106th and Czechia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf