Azerbaijan vs Iraq: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Azerbaijan
- Iraq
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Iraq, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Iraq ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 132nd and Iraq ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 3 and Iraq in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0056 kt | 0.0126 kt | 0.0069 kt | Iraq |
| 2000s | 0.0046 kt | 0.0036 kt | 0.0009 kt | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 0.0026 kt | 0 kt | 0.0026 kt | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 0.0066 kt | 0 kt | 0.0066 kt | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Azerbaijan or Iraq?
- Azerbaijan, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Iraq as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Azerbaijan and Iraq?
- 0 kt, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Iraq?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Iraq rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Azerbaijan ranks 132nd and Iraq ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf