Belgium vs Norway: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Belgium
- Norway
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Norway, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Norway ahead.
Belgium ranks 132nd and Norway ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0009 kt | 0.0007 kt | Norway |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0002 kt | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Belgium or Norway?
- Belgium, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Norway as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Belgium and Norway?
- 0 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Norway?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Norway rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Belgium ranks 132nd and Norway ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf