Botswana vs Sweden: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Botswana
- Sweden
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 132nd and Sweden ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1077 kt | 0.0043 kt | 0.1034 kt | Botswana |
| 2000s | 0.0061 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0055 kt | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0096 kt | 0.0089 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.0005 kt | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Botswana or Sweden?
- Botswana, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Botswana and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Sweden?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Sweden rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Botswana ranks 132nd and Sweden ranks 132nd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf