Burundi vs Latvia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Burundi
- Latvia
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 0.0002 kt against 0.0002 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 99th and Latvia ranks 99th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0119 kt | 0.0019 kt | 0.01 kt | Burundi |
| 2000s | 0.0037 kt | 0.0056 kt | 0.0018 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0046 kt | 0.0009 kt | 0.0037 kt | Burundi |
| 2020s | 0.0005 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0004 kt | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Burundi or Latvia?
- Burundi, at 0.0002 kt against 0.0002 kt in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Burundi and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Latvia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Burundi ranks 99th and Latvia ranks 99th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf