Canada vs Myanmar: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Canada
- Myanmar
How they compare
Canada currently reports 24.35 kt against 16.89 kt in Myanmar, a difference of 7.46 kt.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.4 times Myanmar's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Myanmar ahead.
Canada ranks 6th and Myanmar ranks 9th of 254 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.39 kt | 14.51 kt | 9.13 kt | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 1.18 kt | 20.04 kt | 18.87 kt | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 2.71 kt | 20.02 kt | 17.31 kt | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 7.96 kt | 19.15 kt | 11.19 kt | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Canada or Myanmar?
- Canada, at 24.35 kt against 16.89 kt in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Canada and Myanmar?
- 7.46 kt, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Myanmar?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Myanmar rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Canada ranks 6th and Myanmar ranks 9th of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf