China vs Oceania: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- China
- Oceania
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 1.9 kt against 1.18 kt in China, a difference of 0.72 kt.
That makes Oceania's figure about 1.6 times China's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Oceania ahead.
China ranks 23rd and Oceania ranks 19th of 219 countries.
Oceania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.49 kt | 8.65 kt | 7.16 kt | Oceania |
| 2000s | 1.53 kt | 5.55 kt | 4.02 kt | Oceania |
| 2010s | 0.9558 kt | 6.47 kt | 5.51 kt | Oceania |
| 2020s | 0.8834 kt | 5.69 kt | 4.81 kt | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, China or Oceania?
- Oceania, at 1.9 kt against 1.18 kt in China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between China and Oceania?
- 0.72 kt, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Oceania?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do China and Oceania rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- China ranks 23rd and Oceania ranks 19th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf