Comoros vs Ireland: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Comoros
- Ireland
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Ireland, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 106th and Ireland ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 3 and Ireland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0024 kt | 0.0011 kt | 0.0014 kt | Comoros |
| 2000s | 0.0072 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0067 kt | Comoros |
| 2010s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0002 kt | Comoros |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0.0003 kt | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Comoros or Ireland?
- Comoros, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Ireland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Comoros and Ireland?
- 0 kt, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Ireland?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Ireland rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Comoros ranks 106th and Ireland ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf