Congo vs Nigeria: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Congo
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 0.5954 kt against 0.5043 kt in Congo, a difference of 0.0911 kt.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nigeria ahead.
Congo ranks 30th and Nigeria ranks 29th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5016 kt | 5.21 kt | 4.71 kt | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 0.4836 kt | 1.66 kt | 1.18 kt | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 0.6519 kt | 0.4166 kt | 0.2353 kt | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.6242 kt | 0.8085 kt | 0.1843 kt | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Congo or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 0.5954 kt against 0.5043 kt in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Congo and Nigeria?
- 0.0911 kt, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nigeria?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Nigeria rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Congo ranks 30th and Nigeria ranks 29th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf