Costa Rica vs Rwanda: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Costa Rica
- Rwanda
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 0.0053 kt against 0.0052 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 77th and Rwanda ranks 78th of 219 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0393 kt | 0.0072 kt | 0.0321 kt | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 0.0319 kt | 0.002 kt | 0.0299 kt | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0.0658 kt | 0.002 kt | 0.0638 kt | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 0.0662 kt | 0.0015 kt | 0.0647 kt | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Costa Rica or Rwanda?
- Costa Rica, at 0.0053 kt against 0.0052 kt in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Costa Rica and Rwanda?
- 0.0001 kt, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Rwanda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Rwanda rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Costa Rica ranks 77th and Rwanda ranks 78th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf