Croatia vs Moldova: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Croatia
- Moldova
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.0002 kt against 0.0002 kt in Moldova, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 123rd and Moldova ranks 123rd of 254 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0207 kt | 0.0014 kt | 0.0193 kt | Croatia |
| 2000s | 0.0066 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.006 kt | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.0077 kt | 0.0045 kt | 0.0032 kt | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.0099 kt | 0.0033 kt | 0.0066 kt | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Croatia or Moldova?
- Croatia, at 0.0002 kt against 0.0002 kt in Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Croatia and Moldova?
- 0 kt, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Moldova rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Croatia ranks 123rd and Moldova ranks 123rd of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf