Croatia vs Mongolia: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Croatia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.0002 kt against 0.0002 kt in Mongolia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Mongolia ahead.
Croatia ranks 99th and Mongolia ranks 99th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0207 kt | 0.5975 kt | 0.5768 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0.0066 kt | 0.1318 kt | 0.1252 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.0077 kt | 0.022 kt | 0.0143 kt | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0.0099 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0097 kt | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Croatia or Mongolia?
- Croatia, at 0.0002 kt against 0.0002 kt in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Croatia and Mongolia?
- 0 kt, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Mongolia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Mongolia rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Croatia ranks 99th and Mongolia ranks 99th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf