Czechia vs Germany: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Czechia
- Germany
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Germany, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Germany ahead.
Czechia ranks 106th and Germany ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Germany in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0007 kt | 0.0007 kt | 0.0001 kt | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.0005 kt | 0.002 kt | 0.0015 kt | Germany |
| 2010s | 0.0015 kt | 0.0018 kt | 0.0003 kt | Germany |
| 2020s | 0.0019 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0013 kt | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Czechia or Germany?
- Czechia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Germany as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Czechia and Germany?
- 0 kt, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Germany?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Germany rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Czechia ranks 106th and Germany ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf