Ecuador vs Syria: LULUCF — Emissions
LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Ecuador
- Syria
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0128 kt against 0.0116 kt in Syria, a difference of 0.0012 kt.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Syria's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 86th and Syria ranks 89th of 254 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0148 kt | 0.0016 kt | 0.0132 kt | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 0.0131 kt | 0.0017 kt | 0.0114 kt | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.0199 kt | 0.0037 kt | 0.0162 kt | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.0181 kt | 0.0044 kt | 0.0137 kt | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lulucf — emissions, Ecuador or Syria?
- Ecuador, at 0.0128 kt against 0.0116 kt in Syria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in lulucf — emissions between Ecuador and Syria?
- 0.0012 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Syria?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Syria rank globally for lulucf — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 86th and Syria ranks 89th of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf